CED2
  • Home
  • EVENTS
  • CED-Square on The Press
  • PROJECTS
    • Medical Innovations
    • Automotive Innovations
    • Agricultural Innivations
  • publications and patents
    • Conference
    • Journal Publications
    • Patents
  • ABOUT
  • Contact
  • Home
  • EVENTS
  • CED-Square on The Press
  • PROJECTS
    • Medical Innovations
    • Automotive Innovations
    • Agricultural Innivations
  • publications and patents
    • Conference
    • Journal Publications
    • Patents
  • ABOUT
  • Contact

Annals of Applied Sport Science

11/1/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
Silapabanleng, S., Saadprai, S., Puengtanom, V., Wilaskhampee, S., & Suwondit, P. Comparative of 10-s Sprint Interval Training with Active Recovery at 40% and 20% VO2peak on Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity. Annals of Applied Sport Science, 0-0.
Abstract:   
Background. Wingate-based sprint interval training (SIT) is effective in enhancing aerobic and anaerobic fitness. An Active Recovery (AR) during a 10-s sprint may induce physical adaptation.
Objectives. This study compares the effect of 20% and 40% VO2peak AR during SIT on aerobic and anaerobic capacity.
Methods. Twelve healthy students participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 20% active recovery group (ARG) and 40% ARG. Both groups performed a series of 10-s SIT separated by 4 minutes of AR. The sprints progressed from 4 to 6 over six sessions, separated by 2 days of rest. 20-ARG performed AR at 20%. VO2peak (average VO2 from the last 15 seconds of the incremental exercise test), 40-ARG performed AR at 40% of VO2peak. Aerobic and anaerobic capacity were measured before and after training.
Results. There was no significant difference in VO2peak and maximal incremental power output (Pmax) between 20-ARG and 40-ARG. VO2peak of 20-ARG was significantly increased from pre-training (p=0.004, η2=0.589), whereas VO2peak of 40-ARG increased but was not significantly different. Pmax from both groups was significantly higher than pre-training (p=0.000, η2=0.758). The relative leg strength in 20-ARG was significantly increased from pre-training (p=0.020, η2=0.431). Anaerobic capacity and reproducibility of power output during training were not significantly different between groups or over time. AR at 20% or 40% VO2peak caused similar training effects and reproducibility of power during training.
Conclusion. Practitioners can prescribe a 10-s Wingate-based SIT with low-intensity active recovery to enhance aerobic performance and muscle strength in healthy undergraduate students.

Keywords: Sprint Interval Training, Active Recovery, Aerobic, Anaerobic, Capacity
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-1498-en.html
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    June 2025
    January 2025
    November 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    January 2023
    October 2022
    June 2022
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    November 2019
    April 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    August 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    October 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

We Would Love to Have You Visit Soon!


Hours

M-F: 7am - 7pm

Telephone

+66-(0)-2564-3001 ถึง 9 ต่อ 3247

Email

[email protected]